<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Watch CNBC For Investment Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/complaint-department/why-you-shouldnt-watch-cnbc-for-investment-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/complaint-department/why-you-shouldnt-watch-cnbc-for-investment-advice/</link>
	<description>inlayout, LLC :: Doing Big Things in the Big Easy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H.</title>
		<link>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/complaint-department/why-you-shouldnt-watch-cnbc-for-investment-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?p=178#comment-660</guid>
		<description>@ 504guy

I&#039;m sorry that you would think my view is narrow-minded because I&#039;m open to other ideas. A blog post is only the start of a conversation, not the end of one, and I&#039;ve never claimed to &quot;know everything there is to know&quot; about politics or internet marketing for that matter.

If you wish to start a discussion on credibility, I only have those discussions with people who comment using their real names and email addresses, so going back and forth with someone who posts a comment using a fake name and fake email address (butt@butt.com?!?!) seems futile.

If you don&#039;t like my blog, you don&#039;t have to read it. It is mine though, I own it, and I intend to keep posting whatever I feel like on it. Sorry to disappoint.

Chris Hartwell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 504guy</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry that you would think my view is narrow-minded because I&#8217;m open to other ideas. A blog post is only the start of a conversation, not the end of one, and I&#8217;ve never claimed to &#8220;know everything there is to know&#8221; about politics or internet marketing for that matter.</p>
<p>If you wish to start a discussion on credibility, I only have those discussions with people who comment using their real names and email addresses, so going back and forth with someone who posts a comment using a fake name and fake email address (butt@butt.com?!?!) seems futile.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like my blog, you don&#8217;t have to read it. It is mine though, I own it, and I intend to keep posting whatever I feel like on it. Sorry to disappoint.</p>
<p>Chris Hartwell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 504guy</title>
		<link>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/complaint-department/why-you-shouldnt-watch-cnbc-for-investment-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>504guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?p=178#comment-659</guid>
		<description>conservatives cried tears from heaven and helped push forward every single bank deregulation bill, clinton era or not. The problem now has more to do with securities regulation and the flow of credit than the actual mortgages ... these ridiculous securities were thought to magically eliminate risk ... without them, a subprime loan is a subprime loan, essentially a bad thing.

I&#039;m an internet marketer in new orleans and i really wanted to start reading this blog but I hate when people mix business with politics and seeing your narrow-minded view  detracts from the credibility of your blog.

By the way: CNBC is/has been powered by WSJ news and analysts... the same people that FOX PURCHASED... so minus Kavuto, what the hell is the difference between the two? CNBC is actually conservative is hell anyway so I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re complaining about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>conservatives cried tears from heaven and helped push forward every single bank deregulation bill, clinton era or not. The problem now has more to do with securities regulation and the flow of credit than the actual mortgages &#8230; these ridiculous securities were thought to magically eliminate risk &#8230; without them, a subprime loan is a subprime loan, essentially a bad thing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an internet marketer in new orleans and i really wanted to start reading this blog but I hate when people mix business with politics and seeing your narrow-minded view  detracts from the credibility of your blog.</p>
<p>By the way: CNBC is/has been powered by WSJ news and analysts&#8230; the same people that FOX PURCHASED&#8230; so minus Kavuto, what the hell is the difference between the two? CNBC is actually conservative is hell anyway so I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re complaining about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billigflug</title>
		<link>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/complaint-department/why-you-shouldnt-watch-cnbc-for-investment-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Billigflug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?p=178#comment-585</guid>
		<description>Hello  interesting article
The fact that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers is one of the causes of the financial crisis.Thus  banks gave lower-income families loans with mortgage payments that represent an unusually high percentage of a buyer’s income.
President Clinten agreed at that time the manager&#039;s projects and America is currently suffering the consequences. I have also pointed ou that CNBC never mention that.That&#039;s why CNBC has lost its credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello  interesting article<br />
The fact that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers is one of the causes of the financial crisis.Thus  banks gave lower-income families loans with mortgage payments that represent an unusually high percentage of a buyer’s income.<br />
President Clinten agreed at that time the manager&#8217;s projects and America is currently suffering the consequences. I have also pointed ou that CNBC never mention that.That&#8217;s why CNBC has lost its credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

