<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Orleans Internet Marketing &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com</link>
	<description>inlayout, LLC :: Doing Big Things in the Big Easy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why I can&#8217;t post substantive content here anymore</title>
		<link>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/why-i-cant-post-substantive-content-here-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/why-i-cant-post-substantive-content-here-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris H.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to say it, but my blog has pretty much become useless the past few years. The reasons I started this blog were to provide quality helpful content on SEO and SEM, but I&#8217;ve had to pretty much strip out all the really good useful stuff, and stop writing new stuff altogether due to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I hate to say it, but my blog has pretty much become useless the past few years. The reasons I started this blog were to provide quality helpful content on SEO and SEM, but I&#8217;ve had to pretty much strip out all the really good useful stuff, and stop writing new stuff altogether due to the competitiveness in my niche.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://family-marriage-counseling.com" target="_blank">The Family &amp; Marriage Counseling Directory</a> is my main income producing website, and <a href="http://talkaboutmarriage.com">TalkAboutMarriage.com</a> is its &#8220;sister&#8221; site where people give each other free marriage advice. I started The FMC Directory about 7 years ago, and shortly thereafter a competitor started another directory targeting the exact same keywords and copying my backlinks as closely as possible. Since then, a new directory like mine springs up every year, and there are now at least 5 other sites trying to do what mine has done (drive an enormous amount of referrals to therapists) and failing miserably when it comes to SEO (the best way to do so). Amongst the ranks are Counsel-Search.com, Goodtherapy.org, FixmyFamily.com, Theravive.com, and MarriageFriendlyTherapists.com.<br /><br />

I&#8217;m sorry to say, that with all these guys nipping at my heals constantly, I just can&#8217;t write good SEO stuff like I intended on doing when I first started this site. There&#8217;s plenty of quality SEO information on the web, but the good thing for me is that there&#8217;s plenty of bad info out there as well, and my competitors don&#8217;t know who to follow. At least if they were following me, they&#8217;d know what I&#8217;m doing works. But I can&#8217;t give away that kind of information because it would cost me my business.<br /><br />

So if you&#8217;re ever wondering why I don&#8217;t post anything here these days, this is why&#8230;<img src="http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=240&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/why-i-cant-post-substantive-content-here-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlogCatalog.com Gets Toolbar PageRank Penalty from Google</title>
		<link>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/blogcatalogcom-gets-toolbar-pagerank-penalty-from-google/</link>
		<comments>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/blogcatalogcom-gets-toolbar-pagerank-penalty-from-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>inlayout</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past I&#8217;ve done a few posts about PageRank that may help newcomers understand the difference between &#8220;actual&#8221; PageRank and &#8220;Toolbar&#8221; PageRank, along with some of the anomalies you will see if you look at the Google Toolbar for a long time (no, not visions of Mary either, just the little green bar). One [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In the past I&#8217;ve done a few <a href="http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/search-engine-optimization/seo-basics-is-pagerank-important/">posts about PageRank</a> that may help newcomers understand the difference between &#8220;actual&#8221; PageRank and &#8220;Toolbar&#8221; PageRank, along with some of the <a href="http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/search-engine-optimization/anomalies-with-googles-toolbar-pagerank/">anomalies</a> you will see if you look at the Google Toolbar for a long time (no, not visions of Mary either, just the little green bar).<br /><br />
One of the things I discussed in my post &#8220;<a href="http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/search-engine-optimization/anomalies-with-googles-toolbar-pagerank/">Anomalies with Google’s &#8216;Toolbar PageRank</a>,&#8217;&#8221; was the fact the sometimes search results will look strange when there is a site with low &#8220;toolbar PageRank&#8221; ranking high for competitive keywords. This is sometimes due to the possibility that Google has penalized the website&#8217;s &#8220;toolbar&#8221; PR for selling links.<br /><br />
This appears to be what happened to <a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com">Blog Catalog</a> today. Blog Catalog used to have a PR 6 or 7 homepage, and many interior category pages that were PR5, but if you check today, you will see that they&#8217;ve been bumped down to a PR4. Is Blog Catalog really selling links? You be the judge &#8211; have a look at the <a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/directory/health">top right of the &#8220;Health&#8221; section page (click here)</a>.<br /><br />
Will this affect BlogCatalog&#8217;s search engine rankings? Probably not.<br /><br />
Although it has been argued both ways, I am of the opinion that it WILL affect the &#8220;link juice&#8221; that gets passed down to all of the blogs listed in their directory.<img src="http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=151&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/blogcatalogcom-gets-toolbar-pagerank-penalty-from-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Your SEO Campaign Should Include Outsourced Link Building</title>
		<link>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/why-your-seo-campaign-should-include-outsourced-link-building/</link>
		<comments>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/why-your-seo-campaign-should-include-outsourced-link-building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>inlayout</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of ways to get links for most SEO campaigns, but one thing I almost always do is hire some outsourced personnel who contact related websites asking them to link to the site we&#8217;re promoting from their &#8220;Resource&#8221; pages. This can be very time consuming work, that&#8217;s why most of the people I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of ways to get links for most SEO campaigns, but one thing I almost always do is hire some outsourced personnel who contact related websites asking them to link to the site we&#8217;re promoting from their &#8220;Resource&#8221; pages. This can be very time consuming work, that&#8217;s why most of the people I&#8217;ve met who do this are from India. The value you get for your dollar is very good in India. We pay these link builders anywhere from $5 &#8211; $50 for a link, and we get a one-time fee, permanent link from another website. Outsourcing companies, like <a href="http://outsourcedlinkbuilding.com">OutsourcedLinkBuilding.com</a> are getting more and more popular due to the cheap price of labor overseas. Outsourced Link Building dot com in particular, has secured tons of valuable links for me in the past. Granted, there are times when I wind up paying for a few I wish I hadn&#8217;t, but the overall service is incredible for the price you pay. 
<br /><br />
The value you get from one-time fee, permanent links is so great, because when you specify a decent part of your budget for that, the links really build up over time. So does your PageRank, and so do your rankings. I&#8217;ve found so many ways to get permanent links these days, that it&#8217;s rare that I rent links. To me, renting links (paying a monthly fee) is little different from pay-per-click advertising in that you&#8217;re renting your space at the top. Don&#8217;t rent! Own!<img src="http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=82&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neworleansinternetmarketing.com/uncategorized/why-your-seo-campaign-should-include-outsourced-link-building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
